W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

RE: CfC: publish FPWD of Push API; deadline October 12

From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:31:45 +0000
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "public-webapps@w3c.org" <public-webapps@w3c.org>, EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA <efc@tid.es>
Message-ID: <59A39E87EA9F964A836299497B686C3510057FFE@WABOTH9MSGUSR8D.ITServices.sbc.com>
Hi Art,

An issue has been added as requested in the current draft [1].

[1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-file/default/index.html

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 4:15 AM
> To: public-webapps@w3c.org; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA
> Subject: Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Push API; deadline October 12
> 
> On 10/5/12 7:38 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
> > The Push API Editors would like to publish a First Public Working
> > Draft of their spec and this is a Call for Consensus to do so, using
> > the following spec as the basis
> > <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-file/default/index.html>.
> >
> > This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's
> > decision to request advancement".
> >
> > By publishing this FPWD, the group sends a signal to the community to
> > begin reviewing the document. The FPWD reflects where the group is on
> > this spec at the time of publication; it does _not_ necessarily mean
> > there is consensus on the spec's contents.
> >
> > If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply to
> > this e-mail by October 12 at the latest. Positive response is
> > preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as agreement
> > with the proposal.
> 
> Although there were no objections to this CfC, Jonas raised a number of
> concerns in
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-
> webapps/2012OctDec/0042.html>.
> Although we will have an opportunity to discuss these comments in Lyon,
> I would like the spec Editors to add an "Issue Block" in the Security
> and Privacy concerns section and include a link to Jonas' comment.
> 
> Bryan, Eduardo - I will contact you off-list about preparing the spec
> for FPWD. (See <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/SpecEditing> if you are
> unfamiliar with the W3C's TR publication process.)
> 
> -Thanks, AB
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 21:32:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:55 GMT