W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: RE: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]

From: Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:44:19 +0100
To: "Joshua Bell" <jsbell@chromium.org>, "Kyle Huey" <me@kylehuey.com>, "Israel Hilerio" <israelh@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "James Robinson" <jamesr@google.com>, "Simon Pieters" <simonp@opera.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <abc5b9883b0bb56abb2c45e433d1a064@opera.com>

On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:17 AM, Kyle Huey wrote:
> Gecko does not implement the IDBSync APIs, and
> I don't think that is likely to change in the
> next few months.

From: "Israel Hilerio" <israelh@microsoft.com>

> IE is not planning on implementing the IDBSync
> APIs for IE10 and we proposed to mark them
> "At Risk" on the current spec. 

Sync in workers is a really nice feature. So I guess we can always add it back at a later point.

Right now, Opera doesn't plan on implementing the IDBSync APIs in the immediate future either.

-- Odin
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 09:45:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 13:55:48 UTC