W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2012

RE: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]

From: Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:50:53 +0000
To: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>, Joshua Bell <jsbell@chromium.org>
CC: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>
Message-ID: <F695AF7AA77CC745A271AD0F61BBC61E428D0ABF@TK5EX14MBXC113.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
IE is not planning on implementing the IDBSync APIs for IE10 and we proposed to mark them “At Risk” on the current spec.


On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:17 AM, Kyle Huey wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Joshua Bell <jsbell@chromium.org<mailto:jsbell@chromium.org>> wrote:
Are there implementations of the IDB*Sync APIs for Workers?

Gecko does not implement the IDBSync APIs, and I don't think that is likely to change in the next few months.

- Kyle
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 00:51:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:38 UTC