W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: [IndexedDB] Plans to get to feature complete [Was: Numeric constants vs enumerated strings ]

From: Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:51:54 +0100
To: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: "Simon Pieters" <simonp@opera.com>, "Joshua Bell" <jsbell@chromium.org>, "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "James Robinson" <jamesr@google.com>, "Israel Hilerio" <israelh@microsoft.com>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
Message-ID: <42a98f4fe9e7ad0f7874367c70ed0bd8@opera.com>
> From: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc> 
> I think we've been feature complete for a while now. With one
> exception, which is that some error handling that we've discussed on
> the list needs to be edited into the spec.
> 
> Apart from that we have a number of fairly minor uncontroversial fixes
> (details around generators, order in objectStore/index lists etc), and
> one more controversial fix (numeric vs. string constants). But these
> aren't new features by any means.
> 
> I think the stuff that we have bugs on are mostly things that everyone
> agree that we can and should fix for v1 since they are mostly defining
> things that are currently undefined.



There's one other bug that I wouldn't classify as minor, the one about getting an API for enumerating databases[1]. But other than that I agree.


I'd love to see the currently open issues fixed though ;-)




  1. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16137


-- Odin
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 18:52:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:50 GMT