On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:57:17 +0200, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu> wrote: > (12/06/18 22:45), Simon Pieters wrote: >> I think we should instead either fix the old API (if it turns out to not >> Break the Web) or live with past mistake (if it turns out it does). To >> find out whether it Breaks the Web (and the breakage can't be evanged), >> I suggest we ship the backwards-incompatible change to querySelector() >> in nightly/aurora (or equivalent) in one or more browsers for some time. > > I didn't read through all the QSA threads, but isn't the function name > itself a mistake that many people don't want to live with? We have lots of shipped APIs with worse names. I think we should live with past mistakes, try not to make them again, and move on. -- Simon Pieters Opera SoftwareReceived on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 05:58:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:52 GMT