W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:45:12 -0700
Message-ID: <4FDFBD88.4040804@inkedblade.net>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
CC: ext Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 06/18/2012 04:09 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On 5/30/12 10:38 AM, ext Daniel Glazman wrote:
>> Le 30/05/12 14:43, Arthur Barstow a écrit :
>>
>>> Chris, Daniel, Peter - when will the CSS WG make a decision on the FPWD?
>>
>> We'll try to make one today during our weekly conf-call. Please note
>> that we're going to review the bits of this document falling under CSS
>> WG's wings. In particular section 6. Peter and I already have discovered
>> a few things :
>>
>> 1. "position: center" in section 6.1 refers to an Editor's Draft that is
>> not actively discussed at this time. Only normative references
>> should be made to CSS specs or the Fullscreen draft will have to wait
>> until that ED becomes a REC to itself become a REC.
>>
>> 2. the ::backdrop pseudo-element is not explained in the document
>> outside of section 6.2. It's unclear to me why it is needed, what
>> it represents, etc.
>>
>> 3. the parenthesis in section 6.2 seems to me to contain a copy/paste
>> error "above the element below the element"
>>
>> 4. "layer" and "layer 10" in section 6.1 are unclear. "Layer" is used
>> nowhere in CSS references used in this spec. This must be clarified.
>
> Does the latest ED <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/tip/Overview.html> address the above concerns?

It looks like you missed #2.

~fantasai
Received on Monday, 18 June 2012 23:45:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:52 GMT