W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Is Quota Management API ready for First Public Working Draft?

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 09:40:16 -0400
Message-ID: <4FC4D1C0.1060802@nokia.com>
To: ext Kinuko Yasuda <kinuko@chromium.org>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Kinuko, All - what are people's thoughts on whether or not the Quota 
Management API spec is ready for First Public Working Draft?

A "rule of thumb" for FPWD is that the ED's scope should cover most of 
the expected functionality although the depth of some functionality may 
be very shallow, and it is OK if there are open bugs/issues.

-Thanks, Art

On 5/29/12 12:30 AM, ext Kinuko Yasuda wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl 
> <mailto:annevk@annevk.nl>> wrote:
>
>     On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Kinuko Yasuda
>     <kinuko@chromium.org <mailto:kinuko@chromium.org>> wrote:
>     > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/quota/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
>
>     I noticed something else. StorageInfo is marked as Supplemental and
>     NoInterfaceObject, but I do not think either is meant to be used here.
>     Supplemental has been replaced by "partial interface" (rather than
>     "[Supplemental] interface"), but is only supposed to be used if this
>     is not the original definition (and I do not think StorageInfo is
>     defined elsewhere). NoInterfaceObject is used prevent certain
>     interfaces from being prototyped, but I do not think we want that here
>     either.
>
>
> Oops.. thanks very much for pointing out those mistakes.
> You're right, neither Supplemental nor NoInterfaceObject look 
> appropriate here.
> I dropped them from the draft.
>
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/quota/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
>
> Thanks!
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2012 13:40:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:52 GMT