W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

RE: Push API draft uploaded

From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:08:36 +0000
To: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <59A39E87EA9F964A836299497B686C350FECFE3D@WABOTH9MSGUSR8D.ITServices.sbc.com>
OK, I corrected the [NoInterfaceObject] (I hope), and referenced HTML5 for "resolving a URL".

The numeric readyState was borrowed from EventSource. I will look at the thread, but I think this is something that I will just align with the consensus in the group once determined. I don't have a strong opinion either way.

Latest version is at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-file/default/index.html 

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ms2ger [mailto:ms2ger@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 6:37 AM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Cc: public-webapps
Subject: Re: Push API draft uploaded

Hi Brian,

On 05/24/2012 03:02 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
> Thanks for the comments. I updated the spec:
> - define what happens when url is omitted
> - remove [NoInterfaceObject]
> - define readyState as a unsigned short (that was what was meant in the first place)
> - fix cut/paste errors
>
> I still have to find the source of "resolve a url" as that's a function I borrowed from EventSource.
>
> Latest version is at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-file/default/index.html


Thanks for the update. "resolve a url" is defined in HTML; see 
<http://www.whatwg.org/html/#resolving-urls>.

As for a numeric readyState, please have a look at the discussion at 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2012JanMar/0166.html>.

Finally, it appears that you removed [NoInterfaceObject] from 
NavigatorPush (where I believe it was correct), rather than from 
PushService.

HTH
Ms2ger
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 14:10:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:52 GMT