On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2012, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> > >> > Yes, I understand that. But what's the use case? >> >> The use-case is to provide a more convenient API for developers. >> >> The whole purpose of this thread is to provide a convenience API which >> provides context-free parsing. If we don't care about providing such >> convenience for authors we should just tell them to use the >> already-defined .innerHTML or a custom HTML parser and this whole thread >> is just moot. > > My understanding is that the context for this thread is how to support > <template>. Neither innerHTML nor a custom HTML parser will help for that. > > > On Thu, 10 May 2012, Scott González wrote: >> >> Why is simplicity not enough of an answer? > > It's a fine answer. But I don't think magical APIs are simple. Simplicity > in this case IMHO argues for explicitly selected context. The jQuery API shows that at least jQuery developers don't agree with you regarding what is simpler here. / JonasReceived on Thursday, 10 May 2012 22:37:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:52 GMT