W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Draft Minutes: 1 May 2012 f2f meeting

From: Greg Billock <gbillock@google.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 11:52:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAxVY9emFLVR62+kQGb56NNWD=_CxMPJw=r7sRCQCo2Ln=nCnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, WebIntents <public-web-intents@w3.org>
Looks right to me.

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
> On 5/8/12 1:11 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
> Greg, Tantek, All - I think there is an error in this part of the draft Web
> Intents minutes:
>
> [[
> http://www.w3.org/2012/05/01-webapps-minutes.html#item06
>
>
> tantek:do you know about opendoc and ola?
> ... systems for applications doing this. Have you looked at that?
>
> gbillock:nope
> ... there is IPR in that area that should be looked at.
> ... (I know because I did some of it)
> ]]
>
> Only part of Greg's quote above should be attributed to him and the rest
> should be attributed to Tantek. More specifically, here is what I believe is
> what they said in this exchange:
>
> [[
> http://www.w3.org/2012/05/01-webapps-minutes.html#item06
>
>
> tantek:do you know about opendoc and ola?
> ... systems for applications doing this. Have you looked at that?
>
> gbillock:nope
>
> tantek: there is IPR in that area that should be looked at.
>
> ... (I know because I did some of it)
> ... I felt I had an obligation to make that disclosure
> ]]
>
> Tantek, Greg and Others - what is your recollection on this exchange? Is my
> correction above accurate?
>
> -Thanks, Art
>
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:53:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:52 GMT