W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Adding a note to DOM2 Views

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:14:47 +0000 (UTC)
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
cc: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, "webreq@w3.org" <webreq@w3.org>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1107222113390.3775@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:52:22 +0200, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
> > If we really want to rescind a Recommendation, we should do that 
> > through the process defined for that. If we want to update people on 
> > where to find more recent information (but still the current 
> > specification is still valid for some cases) then we can probably add 
> > a status update.
> 
> Was this in response to the note for DOM Level 2 Views, in response to 
> the request for doing something equivalent for DOM Level 3 Core, or 
> both? I think they should probably be rescinded as they are not to be 
> implemented (or not fully and in conflicting ways in case of DOM Level 3 
> Core), but that is not really something I am interested in driving. Too 
> much process for very little benefit.

FWIW, if we're adding notes, it'd also be good to add a note to the DOM2 
HTML, HTML4.x and XHTML1.x specs saying that they've all been merged into 
the contemporary HTML spec.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 22 July 2011 21:15:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:46 GMT