W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [widget] technology/specification name

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:32:55 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=5ON=Vdk7Vemtn9fep95kmXa6weA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
Cc: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote:
> One issue which comes up is that widget is also used in ARIA to describe ui elements.
> I suspect we'll see apps used ubiquitously; widget seems to e reserved to early experiments in linked apps; apps via iframe.
> Like many on this thread, I don't have a strong objection against the name. I rather appreciate the thread, it's bringing out more distinctions as to what we're talking about and targeting.

Lets just change it to Packaged Web Apps.

Marcos Caceres
Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 08:33:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 13:55:42 UTC