On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:16 AM, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com> wrote: > On 04/14/2011 03:04 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > >>> It would be nice to hear from someone at Opera about their willingness to >>> commit to this change >>> as well. > > As a general point we think that making breaking changes to APIs with > multiple compatible implementations that are already shipping is a really > bad idea. So let's try and make this a one off. > > That said, we will go along with the plan, but we can't commit to a timeline > for releasing the changed version. Thanks James! I agree this is something we should really avoid. The best way I think we can do that in the future is to prefix implementations until specs are agreed to be in a more stable state. I certainly have had my fair share in not doing so enough, so not trying to shift blame here. / JonasReceived on Thursday, 14 April 2011 09:23:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:44 GMT