W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 22:40:17 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTinwd3q_AgqVbQq9Jqc9p=GADOWY00WxbQ_NP0Ex@mail.gmail.com>
To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Benjamin Poulain <benjamin.poulain@nokia.com>, ext Nathan Kitchen <w3c@nathankitchen.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Friday, April 1, 2011, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
>
>> I don't find this compelling, because it assumes that the release
>
>> methodology of SQLite is fixed in stone.
>
> It would be incredibly rude of us to force an independent team of
> developers to change development practices for our benefit.
>
> You can certainly ask if they're interested in doing so, not for "our" benefit (whoever "our" means), but for the benefit of the Web as a whole, and there's nothing at all rude in asking.  I'd say the opposite: it's rude to assume they wouldn't be interested, rather than asking and letting them come to their own decision.  (I don't know where the notion of "forcing" them to do anything came from.)

I am incredibly uncomfortable with the idea of putting the
responsibility of the health of the web in the hands of one project.
In fact, one of the main reasons I started working at Mozilla was to
prevent this.

/ Jonas
Received on Saturday, 2 April 2011 05:40:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:44 GMT