W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2010

Re: Seeking status of Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:16:37 -0500
Message-ID: <4CFD1A75.1000805@nokia.com>
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
OK, so coming back to the what's next for these 3 LC documents question 
[Head]  ...

All of these specs have a Bugzilla component for issue and comment 
tracking, all are included in the WHATWG issue tracker at [Issues], all 
of the specs have changed since their LC was published and all of the 
specs had at least one comment submitted against the LC via public-webapps.

With respect to "does a spec need to return to LC or can it advance to 
Candidate?", Section 7.4.6 of W3C process says:

[[
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#return-to-wg

A technical report is returned to a Working Group for further work in 
either of the following situations:

1. The Working Group makes substantive changes 
<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#substantive-change> 
to the technical report at any time after a Last Call announcement 
<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call> and prior 
to Publication as a Recommendation 
<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#rec-publication>, 
*except* when the changes involve the removal of features at risk 
<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#at-risk-feature> 
identified in a Call for Implementations 
<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#cfi>. In the case of 
substantive changes, the Working Group MUST republish the technical 
report as a Working Draft.
]]

Since Hixie is active on HTML, perhaps someone else is willing to pick 
one of these LCs and to review the issues, bugs, diffs, etc. and propose 
the next step . Any volunteers?

A few weeks ago, I reviewed the diffs, bugs and public-webapps comments 
for Server-sent Events and will send that data separately.

-Art Barstow

[Head] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010OctDec/0755.html
[Issues] http://www.whatwg.org/issues/
[Bugzilla] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/query.cgi?format=advanced


On Nov/29/2010 4:21 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> Ian - regarding the following specs that ended LC on June 30, do you
>> have some type of comment tracking document, like you did for XBL2
>> [XBL2-DoC]?
> I do not believe I kept track of e-mail feedback, but the history of
> feedback filed through Bugzilla is naturally available through Bugzilla.
>
> HTH.
Received on Monday, 6 December 2010 17:17:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:42 GMT