W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2010

[eventsource] Some data re Server-sent Events LC

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:26:55 -0500
Message-ID: <4CFD1CDF.6070902@nokia.com>
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Re event-source spec, a few weeks ago I: reviewed the Bug list, reviewed 
e-mails submitted to public-webapps re the Dec 2009 LC and compared the 
LC version with the latest ED. I did not review WHATWG Issues for this 
spec [Issues] because I didn't know it existed.

= Bugzilla: 4 bugs filed: 3 Fixed; 1 Invalid; see [Bugs]; resolutions 
look OK to me.

= Diff between 19-Dec-2009 LC version 1.106 and version 1.154 
(1-Nov-2010 ED) [Diff]

I think most of the changes can be viewed as Editorial or Bug Fixes. The 
following changes do stick out though and should be reviewed by the 
group - (see [Diff] for Line numbers):

1. v1.106 Line 309 and v1.154 Line 328 - new text is inserted in Section 
2. Although this section is normative, the new text is mostly 
informative. (Clarification)

2. v1.106 Line 367 and v1.154 Line 394 - a new step #4 is added to 
Section 4. of the ED but this text was previously in Section 5 (bug fix).

3. v1.106 Line 460 and v1.154 Line 490 - the diff includes 3 changes: 
the handling of HTTP responses 301, 302, 303 and 307 are merged into one 
paragraph (a good clarification); a non-normative Note was removed; the 
handling of 305 response is moved.

4. v1.106 Line 531 and v1.154 Line 557 - the first paragraph of Section 
7. has been changed to refer to Streams rather than bytes. (Seems like a 
reasonable bug fix.)

= Comments sent to public-webapps

1. From: Krzysztof Maczyński <1981km@gmail.com>
Subject: LCWD comments
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010JulSep/0007.html

Hixie responded to Krzysztof but Krzysztof did not reply.

2. From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Subject: Last-Event-ID in http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010JanMar/0728.html

Maciej and Julian exchanged responses. In the e-mail in this thread, it 
appears Julian was satisfied with Maciej's reasoning:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010JanMar/0735.html

-Art Barstow

[Issues] http://www.whatwg.org/issues/

[Diff]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/eventsource/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.106&r2=1.154&f=h

[Bugs]
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=WebAppsWG&component=Server-Sent+Events+%28editor%3A+Ian+Hickson%29&longdesc_type=allwordssubstr&longdesc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bug_id_type=anyexact&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
Received on Monday, 6 December 2010 17:27:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:42 GMT