- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:42:07 +0200
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Kenneth Russell" <kbr@google.com>
- Cc: "Chris Marrin" <cmarrin@apple.com>, "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Vladimir Vukicevic" <vladimir@mozilla.com>
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:55:33 +0200, Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com> wrote: > Mozilla's experimental name is "mozResponseArrayBuffer", so perhaps to > avoid collisions the spec could call it responseArrayBuffer. While I do not think there would be collision (at least not in ECMAScript, which is what we are designing for) naming it responseArrayBuffer is fine with me. And also now done that way in the draft. Still need to get a saner reference to the ArrayBuffer specification than https://cvs.khronos.org/svn/repos/registry/trunk/public/webgl/doc/spec/TypedArray-spec.html though. :-) http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest-2/ (You can also do send(ArrayBuffer) obviously. I personally think supporting this for both BlobBuilder and send() makes sense. That way Blob/File etc. work too.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 23 September 2010 09:42:53 UTC