W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer integration

From: Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:55:33 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTim2-M8rGv7=Vun_xndWcZmhW4pn-79Kidhd6axB@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Vladimir Vukicevic <vladimir@mozilla.com>
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 08.09.2010 17:35, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> Okay. I guess we can all add support for it and see who screams :-)
>>
>> I can certainly add this to XMLHttpRequest Level 2 and have been wanting
>> to do that since forever. As you might have seen notes to that effect
>> are in the specification. send() can be overloaded as per usual.
>> Currently the proposal for the response member is responseBody which
>> nicely maps to HTTP entity body.
>> ...
>
> It does, but doesn't it clash with responseBody in Microsoft's ActiveX
> control?
> (<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms534368%28v=VS.85%29.aspx>)

Mozilla's experimental name is "mozResponseArrayBuffer", so perhaps to
avoid collisions the spec could call it responseArrayBuffer.

-Ken
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 17:56:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:40 GMT