- From: Vladimir Vukicevic <vladimir@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com>
----- Original Message ----- > On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:55:33 +0200, Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com> > wrote: > > Mozilla's experimental name is "mozResponseArrayBuffer", so perhaps to > > avoid collisions the spec could call it responseArrayBuffer. > > While I do not think there would be collision (at least not in ECMAScript, > which is what we are designing for) naming it responseArrayBuffer is fine > with me. And also now done that way in the draft. Still need to get a > saner reference to the ArrayBuffer specification than > https://cvs.khronos.org/svn/repos/registry/trunk/public/webgl/doc/spec/TypedArray-spec.html > though. :-) How about http://bit.ly/TypedArray-spec ? :) - Vlad
Received on Thursday, 23 September 2010 17:56:19 UTC