- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:44:28 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 08.09.2010 17:35, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > ... > Okay. I guess we can all add support for it and see who screams :-) > > I can certainly add this to XMLHttpRequest Level 2 and have been wanting > to do that since forever. As you might have seen notes to that effect > are in the specification. send() can be overloaded as per usual. > Currently the proposal for the response member is responseBody which > nicely maps to HTTP entity body. > ... It does, but doesn't it clash with responseBody in Microsoft's ActiveX control? (<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms534368%28v=VS.85%29.aspx>) Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 15:45:07 UTC