- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:59:31 -0800
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: ext Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Dec 4, 2009, at 4:07 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On Dec 3, 2009, at 9:23 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote: > >> As predicted last week [1], I have replied to the outstanding >> issues that >> had been raised on the following specs, and thus am ready to >> suggest that >> we take these specs to LC to get wider review: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/ >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/ >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/ >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/workers/ >> >> A six month review period should be reasonable, so I would suggest >> giving >> a last call "deadline" of something like July 1st 2010. > > Would those that have implemented and/or deployed the above specs > please comment on the LC review period length for these specs? > > If we already have multiple implementations of a spec, I think the > spirit of the Recommendation track process suggests a shorter LC > period (say 2 months given the time of the year) and then (assuming > no substantive comments) moving the spec to Candidate. The WebKit project has implementations all the cited specs. However, many of them are still in progress and not 100% feature complete. Some have not shipped in a non-beta product yet. Overall we are still at the point where we are discovering new issues in the course of implementation. I estimate that within 4-6 months we will have feature- complete versions of all the specs implemented and in most cases shipping in at least one of Safari or Chrome. Regards, Maciej
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 17:00:11 UTC