W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit]

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 07:07:10 -0500
Message-Id: <DD2DD409-6B32-43D3-A20F-CC3B42D0DE9F@nokia.com>
To: ext Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Dec 3, 2009, at 9:23 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:

> As predicted last week [1], I have replied to the outstanding  
> issues that
> had been raised on the following specs, and thus am ready to  
> suggest that
> we take these specs to LC to get wider review:
>    http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/
>    http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/
>    http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/
>    http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/
>    http://dev.w3.org/html5/workers/
> A six month review period should be reasonable, so I would suggest  
> giving
> a last call "deadline" of something like July 1st 2010.

Would those that have implemented and/or deployed the above specs  
please comment on the LC review period length for these specs?

If we already have multiple implementations of a spec, I think the  
spirit of the Recommendation track process suggests a shorter LC  
period (say 2 months given the time of the year) and then (assuming  
no substantive comments) moving the spec to Candidate.

-Art Barstow
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 12:08:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:21 UTC