W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit]

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:19:27 +0000 (UTC)
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0912041218080.5629@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> If we already have multiple implementations of a spec, I think the 
> spirit of the Recommendation track process suggests a shorter LC period 
> (say 2 months given the time of the year) and then (assuming no 
> substantive comments) moving the spec to Candidate.

I don't realistically think I'd have time to address the likely volume of 
comments in two months, since I am also dealing with HTML5's last call 
comments in the WHATWG and will likely be starting work on some more 
specifications in January.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 12:20:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:21 UTC