W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:21:33 +0100
Message-ID: <b21a10670912011421q33804ff8y72d88f6859fb8ff0@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tuesday, December 1, 2009, Marcin Hanclik
<Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com> wrote:
> Hi Art, All,
> ACCESS does not support this publication.
> Our motivation is that the comments received during the LC#1 were not all addressed.

Please list exactly which comment were not addressed.

> Since the PAG has started with the earlier draft of WARP and relation to PAG was an argument for LC#2, we assume that the group still has time to accommodate the LC#1 comments in the present version of the specification without the detrimental effect on the proceedings within PAG.

that's absurd. The PAG had no bearing on this work. Work continues as
normal.  Also, what the PAG has or had not done is member
confidential; please stop discussing PAG matters in public.

If you have *actual* issues with the current draft, list them quickly
so we can address them ASAP.

> Thanks,
> Marcin
> Marcin Hanclik
> ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
> Tel: +49-208-8290-6452  |  Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
> Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
> E-Mail: marcin.hanclik@access-company.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-webapps-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Barstow
> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 3:50 PM
> To: public-webapps
> Subject: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December
> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish Last Call Working Draft
> #2 of:
>   http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access/
> This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's
> decision to request advancement" for this LCWD. Note that as
> specified in the Process Document [PD], a Working Group's Last Call
> announcement is a signal that:
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant
> technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements
> document) in the Working Draft;
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant
> dependencies with other groups;
> * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these
> dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call
> announcement is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to
> advance the technical report to later maturity levels.
> As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and
> encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for
> comments is December 2.
> For some additional background on this proposal, see:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/
> 0947.html
> -Art Barstow
> ________________________________________
> Access Systems Germany GmbH
> Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
> HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda
> www.access-company.com
> This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.

Marcos Caceres
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 22:22:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:21 UTC