W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:21:33 +0100
Message-ID: <b21a10670912011421q33804ff8y72d88f6859fb8ff0@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tuesday, December 1, 2009, Marcin Hanclik
<Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com> wrote:
> Hi Art, All,
>
> ACCESS does not support this publication.
> Our motivation is that the comments received during the LC#1 were not all addressed.
>

Please list exactly which comment were not addressed.

> Since the PAG has started with the earlier draft of WARP and relation to PAG was an argument for LC#2, we assume that the group still has time to accommodate the LC#1 comments in the present version of the specification without the detrimental effect on the proceedings within PAG.
>

that's absurd. The PAG had no bearing on this work. Work continues as
normal.  Also, what the PAG has or had not done is member
confidential; please stop discussing PAG matters in public.

If you have *actual* issues with the current draft, list them quickly
so we can address them ASAP.

> Thanks,
> Marcin
>
> Marcin Hanclik
> ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
> Tel: +49-208-8290-6452  |  Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
> Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
> E-Mail: marcin.hanclik@access-company.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-webapps-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Barstow
> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 3:50 PM
> To: public-webapps
> Subject: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December
>
> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish Last Call Working Draft
> #2 of:
>
>   http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access/
>
> This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's
> decision to request advancement" for this LCWD. Note that as
> specified in the Process Document [PD], a Working Group's Last Call
> announcement is a signal that:
>
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant
> technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements
> document) in the Working Draft;
>
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant
> dependencies with other groups;
>
> * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these
> dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call
> announcement is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to
> advance the technical report to later maturity levels.
>
> As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and
> encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for
> comments is December 2.
>
> For some additional background on this proposal, see:
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/
> 0947.html
>
> -Art Barstow
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
>
> Access Systems Germany GmbH
> Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
> HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda
>
> www.access-company.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
>
>

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 22:22:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:35 GMT