W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

RE: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference

From: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:22:12 +0100
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
CC: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FAA1D89C5BAF1142A74AF116630A9F2C28942D7941@OBEEX01.obe.access-company.com>
Hi Robin,

>>Can you please update this to just be a delta?
As far as I know W3C specs, delta documents are usually errata or WG Notes.
Even currently on-going specification work is based on new revisions of the existing documents.
Therefore I would keep the document as it is.

As for UPnP, I was thinking further and actually I seem to have chosen wrong name for the "new" / revised spec. The main use case I am thinking of is the more concrete specification of the local network addresses (aka pattern based or "local" as proposed by some reviewers) that has actually nothing to do with UPnP as such. It is just about retrieval of the content whose URL is "local" (probably retrieved over UPnP stack, but it does not matter here).

Thanks,
Marcin

Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452  |  Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanclik@access-company.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin@berjon.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 7:24 PM
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: Arthur Barstow; public-webapps
Subject: Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference

Hi Marcin,

On Nov 20, 2009, at 18:12 , Marcin Hanclik wrote:
> As discussed on the yesterday's call, I committed to CVS the WARP spec with the section about local network (required for UPnP use cases) at:
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access-upnp/

What we discussed on the call was actually creating this as a delta specification that would add a way of expressing that access to the local network is requested. I don't think that it's a good idea to copy the rest of the WARP spec since any edit will bring it out of sync. It's also confusing in that it gives the impression that this document defines WARP, or that simply adding a "local" keyword is enough to make it work. Can you please update this to just be a delta?

Thanks,

--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/




________________________________________

Access Systems Germany GmbH
Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda

www.access-company.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 21:23:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:35 GMT