Arun Ranganathan wrote: > The latest revision of the FileAPI editor's draft is available here: > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/ > ... > > 4. A suggestion to *not* have a separate scheme ("filedata:") in lieu of > urn:uuid:<uuid>[2] has been the basis of a rewrite of that feature in > this version of the specification. > ... Is there a particular reason why a specific URI scheme needs to be called out at all? (there are other schemes that may be more flexible, for instance because they allow using a UUID/String pair for identification). Best regards, JulianReceived on Thursday, 29 October 2009 08:50:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:22 GMT