- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:03:13 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, arun@mozilla.com
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > ... >> What's wrong with urn:uuid, which is defined in RFC 4122 and already >> cited? > > You need to know what the URL is for in other contexts. It seems nicer > if that is explicit from the scheme rather than some additional bit of > data that is attached to the uuid. Example? Pushing this information into the URI seems to be the wrong thing to me... BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2009 18:03:57 UTC