W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: File API commens

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:03:48 +0200
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: "Larry Masinter" <masinter@adobe.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, arun@mozilla.com
Message-ID: <op.u1hq0mvw64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook.local>
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:53:32 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
> Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> ...
>> I think we'd really like to avoid creating a new scheme if we could
>> reuse an existing one. I know Arun was looking for an existing scheme,
>> but not sure if he looked at the 'urn' scheme.
>>  Would it need to be urn:somename:uuid though? like urn:fileid:uuid?
>> ...
> What's wrong with urn:uuid, which is defined in RFC 4122 and already  
> cited?

You need to know what the URL is for in other contexts. It seems nicer if  
that is explicit from the scheme rather than some additional bit of data  
that is attached to the uuid.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2009 17:04:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:20 UTC