W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published

From: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:37:02 -0400
Message-Id: <3C3EEDF8-41E4-4800-9F40-6E8CD7491358@nokia.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
To: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
On Oct 6, 2009, at 6:34 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Arthur Barstow  
> <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
>> Marcsos, All, - given the next publication of the widgets P&C spec  
>> will be a
>> LCWD, should the feature at risk stuff (its:dir) be deleted?
>>
>
> I don't know :( I think we should remove the at risk, and just run
> with it. It's still going to be optional, but at least it provides a
> solution for those that need it.
>
> The other way forward is that we remove ITS, make a new spec that
> defines our own @dir and <span> elements in the widget namespace. I've
> put that idea to the group before and didn't get a very positive
> response. My only personal gripe with ITS is that it requires another
> namespace. That's a pain for both developers and implementers. But, I
> can live with it.

Do we have any evidence at all that it (as defined in the 23- 
July-2009 Candidate) either has been implemented or is being  
implemented?

-Regards, Art Barstow
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2009 10:38:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:34 GMT