W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:46:10 +0200
Message-ID: <b21a10670910060346u4ecc076eiba3fff288dc657e7@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
> On Oct 6, 2009, at 6:34 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Marcsos, All, - given the next publication of the widgets P&C spec will
>>> be a
>>> LCWD, should the feature at risk stuff (its:dir) be deleted?
>>>
>>
>> I don't know :( I think we should remove the at risk, and just run
>> with it. It's still going to be optional, but at least it provides a
>> solution for those that need it.
>>
>> The other way forward is that we remove ITS, make a new spec that
>> defines our own @dir and <span> elements in the widget namespace. I've
>> put that idea to the group before and didn't get a very positive
>> response. My only personal gripe with ITS is that it requires another
>> namespace. That's a pain for both developers and implementers. But, I
>> can live with it.
>
> Do we have any evidence at all that it (as defined in the 23-July-2009
> Candidate) either has been implemented or is being implemented?

No, we do not have any evidence or commitment of implementation of
this feature.

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2009 10:46:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:34 GMT