- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:50:05 +0300
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Jun 1, 2009, at 18:26, Marcos Caceres wrote: > Imagine that a new groups need to be set up to deal with Camara- > privacy, Contacts-privacy, etc., etc.,... this stuff is going to > take like 10 years to sort out. One might argue that camera shouldn't be an API but a UI extension of the <input type=file> file picker and that the operations of adding contacts or calendar items should be based on user initiating an action on microformat/microdata marked-up part of a page. It's easy to see how the Right Thing and time-to-market are at odds here. > Also, it is hard to tell if Mozilla has done a good job or not with > their UIs: Those APIs and the corresponding user interfaces have not > been in the wild long enough to be able to give an objective > assessment... Fair point. > For the purpose of the disposition of comments, and as far as the > current text in the specification goes, can I record that your > comments have been addressed? You may record my questions as addressed with the commenter agreeing except for one case: I still think that the policy of having to use <feature> to activate a feature should be presumptively limited to widget-oriented features instead of being presumptively required for new features in general. I'll start new threads for additional comments -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 12:50:50 UTC