Re: [widgets] Dig Sig review in prep for LC

+1

I don't see the need for that paragraph.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Apr 29, 2009, at 6:36 AM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote:

>> Hi Frederick,
>> Some tiny editorial changes....
>>
>> I think we should add the following sub-section to the Status of
>> This Document:
>>
>> [[
>> <h3 class="no-num no-toc">Note to Last Call Reviewers</h3>
>> <p><em>This section is non-normative.</em></p>
>> <p>The editors of this specification respond rapidly to all feedback
>> and continuously make corrections to this document. Unless you are
>> reading this document on the date of publication, <strong
>> class="redNote">it is extremely  likely that this document has been
>> superseded</strong>. Instead of reviewing this published draft,  
>> please
>> review the <a href="http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets- 
>> digsig/">latest
>> editor's draft</a> and make sure to cite the date of that draft in  
>> the
>> feedback sent to the Web Apps Working Group's public mailing list <a
>> href=
>> "mailto:public-webapps@w3.org">public-Webapps@w3.org</a>. </p>
>> <p>Please also be sure to check the mailing list <a href=
>> "http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/">archive</a> to
>> see if any issues uncovered have already been addressed. To help with
>> cataloging issues, prefix emails to the mailing list with the string
>> <samp>[widgets]</samp>. Any and all feedback is welcomed.</p>
>> ]]
>
> Well... Doesn't "Last Call" suggest that you're actually beyond the
> phase of rapid changes?
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 12:33:36 UTC