W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [widgets] Dig Sig review in prep for LC

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:36:08 +0200
To: marcosc@opera.com
Message-Id: <774684F8-3D19-41E7-AF80-30016EE7CE0C@w3.org>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
> Hi Frederick,
> Some tiny editorial changes....
>
> I think we should add the following sub-section to the Status of  
> This Document:
>
> [[
> <h3 class="no-num no-toc">Note to Last Call Reviewers</h3>
> <p><em>This section is non-normative.</em></p>
> <p>The editors of this specification respond rapidly to all feedback
> and continuously make corrections to this document. Unless you are
> reading this document on the date of publication, <strong
> class="redNote">it is extremely  likely that this document has been
> superseded</strong>. Instead of reviewing this published draft, please
> review the <a href="http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/">latest
> editor's draft</a> and make sure to cite the date of that draft in the
> feedback sent to the Web Apps Working Group's public mailing list <a
> href=
> "mailto:public-webapps@w3.org">public-Webapps@w3.org</a>. </p>
> <p>Please also be sure to check the mailing list <a href=
> "http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/">archive</a> to
> see if any issues uncovered have already been addressed. To help with
> cataloging issues, prefix emails to the mailing list with the string
> <samp>[widgets]</samp>. Any and all feedback is welcomed.</p>
> ]]

Well... Doesn't "Last Call" suggest that you're actually beyond the  
phase of rapid changes?
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 10:36:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:31 GMT