W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Discussions with HTTP WG about Origin header [was: Do we need to rename the Origin header?]

From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:31:03 -0400
Message-ID: <68fba5c50904080931na719657g50f48137f1b3caa1@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Bil Corry <bil@corry.biz>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Weinig <weinig@apple.com>
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote:
> Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, 2009-04-06 11:19 +0200:
>
>>  (The http-wg discussion looked ill-informed; among other things, they didn't
>>  understand the relationship with CORS.)

Why would they? The Origin header seems to be the solution to many
problems. It's not obvious that it should be reused for each one.

-- 

Robert Sayre

"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 16:31:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:31 GMT