W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Discussions with HTTP WG about Origin header [was: Do we need to rename the Origin header?]

From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:31:03 -0400
Message-ID: <68fba5c50904080931na719657g50f48137f1b3caa1@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Bil Corry <bil@corry.biz>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Weinig <weinig@apple.com>
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote:
> Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, 2009-04-06 11:19 +0200:
>>  (The http-wg discussion looked ill-informed; among other things, they didn't
>>  understand the relationship with CORS.)

Why would they? The Origin header seems to be the solution to many
problems. It's not obvious that it should be reused for each one.


Robert Sayre

"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 16:31:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 13:55:25 UTC