Re: Proposal: High resolution (and otherwise improved) timer API

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:43:55 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  
wrote:
> - Perhaps the argument order should be (handler, delay, repeating)  
> instead, to be more like setTimeout / setInterval
>
> - Perhaps the "repeating" or even the "delayInSeconds" arguments should  
> be optional, defaulting to false and 0 respectively, and possibly in  
> combination with the above suggestion.

I think that would be nice.


I was wondering why startTimer returns a Timer object. What is the use  
case for that?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>