- From: Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:46:42 -0400
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org, XMLSec XMLSec Member-Only <member-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org>
Marcos Caceres wrote: > Hi Sean, > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@sun.com> wrote: >> Marcos Caceres wrote: >>> However, do you think we should be referencing version 4? has there >>> been much uptake of v4? >> Not sure, but I would be more inclined to reference RFC 5280: >> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5280.txt > > Ok, I've updated the reference. It now reads: > [X.509v3] > Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate > Revocation List (CRL) Profile. D. Cooper, S. Santesson, S. Boeyen, R. > Housley, and W. Polk. May 2008. RFC5280 is available at > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5280.txt > > For our record keeping of LC comments, could you please confirm that > the Working Group has addressed your comments. Yes, confirmed. > > Thank you again for taking the time to do the review. You're welcome. --Sean
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2008 12:47:26 UTC