Hi Sean, I've fixed the typos, I have one question about X.509v4. Please see below. On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:20 AM, Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@sun.com> wrote: > > Here are some comments - > > An XML Digital Signature reference is defined but never referenced. Also, > the reference description and 2nd URL needs to be updated to reflect the > date of the 2nd edition (June 2008) and the authors. You list the editors, > but the authors is probably more appropriate. As it is never used, I have removed it. However, I'll be sure to reference it properly in our other specs, particularly in the Widgets: 1.0 Digital Signature spec [1]. I've also removed a few other references that were no longer used in this version of the document. > What version of X.509 are you referencing? v3, v4? I've updated the references to version 3, using the following citation: ITU-T Recommendation X.509 version 3 (1997). "Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - The Directory Authentication Framework" ISO/IEC 9594-8:1997. However, do you think we should be referencing version 4? has there been much uptake of v4? Kind regards, Marcos [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/ -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.auReceived on Wednesday, 25 June 2008 02:28:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:58 GMT