Marcos Caceres wrote: >> What version of X.509 are you referencing? v3, v4? > > I've updated the references to version 3, using the following citation: > ITU-T Recommendation X.509 version 3 (1997). "Information Technology - > Open Systems Interconnection - The Directory Authentication Framework" > ISO/IEC 9594-8:1997. > > However, do you think we should be referencing version 4? has there > been much uptake of v4? Not sure, but I would be more inclined to reference RFC 5280: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5280.txt --SeanReceived on Wednesday, 25 June 2008 13:38:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:58 GMT