W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:59:41 -0700
Message-ID: <48570C7D.2020402@sicking.cc>
To: Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>
CC: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Marc Silbey <marcsil@windows.microsoft.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Eric Lawrence <ericlaw@exchange.microsoft.com>, David Ross <dross@windows.microsoft.com>, "Mark Shlimovich (SWI)" <marksh@microsoft.com>, Doug Stamper <dstamper@exchange.microsoft.com>, Zhenbin Xu <Zhenbin.Xu@microsoft.com>, Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>

Opps, forget what I said. Seems like Arthur had already replied and 
asked that we debate these issues before filing issues.

That is a good idea too.

/ Jonas

Sunava Dutta wrote:
> I LOVE the idea!
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Doug Schepers [mailto:schepers@w3.org]
>> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 12:39 PM
>> To: Chris Wilson
>> Cc: Ian Hickson; Sunava Dutta; Arthur Barstow; Marc Silbey; public-
>> webapps; Eric Lawrence; David Ross; Mark Shlimovich (SWI); Doug
>> Stamper; Zhenbin Xu; Michael Champion
>> Subject: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's
>> feedback on XHR2)
>> Hi, Folks-
>> It might be useful if specific points were raised as issue in the
>> WebApps Tracker [1], rather than just floating around on email (be it
>> PDF, HTML, or plaintext).  That way, they could be addressed in a
>> concise and systematic manner.
>> Do people (specifically, the chairs, the editor, and the contributors)
>> think this would be useful?
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products/4
>> Regards-
>> -Doug Schepers
>> W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2008 01:03:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:09 UTC