W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2008

RE: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2)

From: Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:02:22 -0700
To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Marc Silbey <marcsil@windows.microsoft.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Eric Lawrence <ericlaw@exchange.microsoft.com>, David Ross <dross@windows.microsoft.com>, "Mark Shlimovich (SWI)" <marksh@microsoft.com>, Doug Stamper <dstamper@exchange.microsoft.com>, Zhenbin Xu <Zhenbin.Xu@microsoft.com>, Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <083D18C6B9B71F4CBCA7B76D97B748310C7D7256BC@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> 
I LOVE the idea!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Schepers [mailto:schepers@w3.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 12:39 PM
> To: Chris Wilson
> Cc: Ian Hickson; Sunava Dutta; Arthur Barstow; Marc Silbey; public-
> webapps; Eric Lawrence; David Ross; Mark Shlimovich (SWI); Doug
> Stamper; Zhenbin Xu; Michael Champion
> Subject: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's
> feedback on XHR2)
>
> Hi, Folks-
>
> It might be useful if specific points were raised as issue in the
> WebApps Tracker [1], rather than just floating around on email (be it
> PDF, HTML, or plaintext).  That way, they could be addressed in a
> concise and systematic manner.
>
> Do people (specifically, the chairs, the editor, and the contributors)
> think this would be useful?
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products/4

>
> Regards-
> -Doug Schepers
> W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF
>
Received on Monday, 16 June 2008 23:03:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:58 GMT