W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2008

Re: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2

From: Cindy Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:55:42 -0400
Message-ID: <dbdb69c90806161155q32b99b1bie51ce440ee208f8a@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Chris Wilson" <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Sunava Dutta" <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "Marc Silbey" <marcsil@windows.microsoft.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Eric Lawrence" <ericlaw@exchange.microsoft.com>, "David Ross" <dross@windows.microsoft.com>, "Mark Shlimovich (SWI)" <marksh@microsoft.com>, "Doug Stamper" <dstamper@exchange.microsoft.com>, "Zhenbin Xu" <Zhenbin.Xu@microsoft.com>, "Michael Champion" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>

Hi..

*Most respectfully*..

Could you then, or perhaps someone else on behalf of Microsoft,
provide an accessible alternative for those of us participating who
have cognitive disabilities..?

It would be my most humble observation followed by presumption that
this would be, *in part*, Ian's purpose in providing a smaller version
of what was originally submitted for review.. Providing readily
available [talking points or table of contents] that lead to the then
expanded supportive materials would help accomplish this request..

Thank you so much in advance whichever you decide (so as to save
chatter from my end on the list)..

Peace and best wishes from Talking Rock.. :)

Cindy Sue

- :: -
CindySueCausey.blogspot.com
www.ButterflyBytes.com
Georgia Voices That Count, 2005
Talking Rock, GA, USA



On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Chris Wilson
<Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> No.
>
> I understand why you might like to edit our feedback, Ian, but your edit does not, in fact, represent Microsoft's feedback on cross-domain.  What you call "redacting background material" I call "removing principles such that remaining points might seem unprincipled."  The members of the WG (and the public) are welcome to draw their own conclusions from our statements; I am NOT willing to have you be the one who draws their conclusions for them.
>
> As every email software package I'm aware of can handle HTML and text, and most of them can do an automatic translation between the two of them, I'll ask you again to not editorialize on Microsoft's motives or actions for the group.  Particularly when you are redacting the very principles at issue.
Received on Monday, 16 June 2008 18:56:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:25 GMT