W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2008

RE: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2

From: Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:04:20 -0700
To: Cindy Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Marc Silbey <marcsil@windows.microsoft.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Eric Lawrence <ericlaw@exchange.microsoft.com>, David Ross <dross@windows.microsoft.com>, "Mark Shlimovich (SWI)" <marksh@microsoft.com>, Doug Stamper <dstamper@exchange.microsoft.com>, Zhenbin Xu <Zhenbin.Xu@microsoft.com>, Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <083D18C6B9B71F4CBCA7B76D97B748310C7D72550C@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Thanks. Your request makes perfect sense and we're working on getting this out.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cindy Sue Causey [mailto:butterflybytes@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 11:56 AM
> To: Chris Wilson
> Cc: Ian Hickson; Sunava Dutta; Arthur Barstow; Marc Silbey; public-
> webapps; Eric Lawrence; David Ross; Mark Shlimovich (SWI); Doug
> Stamper; Zhenbin Xu; Michael Champion
> Subject: Re: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2
> Hi..
> *Most respectfully*..
> Could you then, or perhaps someone else on behalf of Microsoft,
> provide an accessible alternative for those of us participating who
> have cognitive disabilities..?
> It would be my most humble observation followed by presumption that
> this would be, *in part*, Ian's purpose in providing a smaller version
> of what was originally submitted for review.. Providing readily
> available [talking points or table of contents] that lead to the then
> expanded supportive materials would help accomplish this request..
> Thank you so much in advance whichever you decide (so as to save
> chatter from my end on the list)..
> Peace and best wishes from Talking Rock.. :)
> Cindy Sue
> - :: -
> CindySueCausey.blogspot.com
> www.ButterflyBytes.com
> Georgia Voices That Count, 2005
> Talking Rock, GA, USA
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Chris Wilson
> <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > No.
> >
> > I understand why you might like to edit our feedback, Ian, but your
> edit does not, in fact, represent Microsoft's feedback on cross-domain.
> What you call "redacting background material" I call "removing
> principles such that remaining points might seem unprincipled."  The
> members of the WG (and the public) are welcome to draw their own
> conclusions from our statements; I am NOT willing to have you be the
> one who draws their conclusions for them.
> >
> > As every email software package I'm aware of can handle HTML and
> text, and most of them can do an automatic translation between the two
> of them, I'll ask you again to not editorialize on Microsoft's motives
> or actions for the group.  Particularly when you are redacting the very
> principles at issue.

Received on Monday, 16 June 2008 19:05:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:09 UTC