W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > February 2013

RE: Seeking status and plans for Web Messaging test suite

From: Alex Kuang <Alex.Kuang@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:58:55 +0000
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <ad392ad362424fff90555987ab309a8d@BLUPR03MB051.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Art,

I've just copied 8 Channel Messaging tests from Workers [2] to WebMessaging [1]:

Changeset: 
	https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webapps/rev/b5a2558005ab 
Tests:
	Channel_MessagePort_initial_disabled.htm
	Channel_MessagePort_onmessage_start.htm
	Channel_postMessage_DataCloneErr.htm
	Channel_postMessage_clone_port.htm
	Channel_postMessage_clone_port_error.htm
	Channel_postMessage_event_properties.htm
	Channel_postMessage_ports_readonly_array.htm
	Channel_postMessage_target_source.htm

Yes, I consider Microsoft's submission [1] is now sufficient to test the CR's exit criteria. I am going to send out a RfR mail to start a formal review of those tests shortly.

Thanks,
Alex

[2] <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/Workers/tests/submissions/Microsoft/>


-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:02 AM
To: Alex Kuang; public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org
Subject: Seeking status and plans for Web Messaging test suite

Hi Alex,

What is the status and next steps for the Web Messaging test suite?

Do you consider Microsoft's submission [1] sufficient to test the CR's exit criteria? Is there any reason why we should not start a formal review of those tests now?

-Thanks, ArtB

[1] <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebMessaging/tests/submissions/Microsoft/>
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2013 02:05:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 April 2014 14:15:59 UTC