Re: [webcomponents] Figure out terminology for Shadow DOM that everyone agrees on (#382)

Now, the spec is not using the composed {parent/child/ancestor/descendant} terminologies.

As the next step, I am now trying to avoid terminologies which are related to "composed tree of node trees". I am now rewriting the spec so that we do not need to use "composed tree".



---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/382#issuecomment-200309619

Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2016 11:40:36 UTC