Re: [webcomponents] Figure out terminology for Shadow DOM that everyone agrees on (#382)

I successfully updated the spec so that it does not depend on a concept of *composed tree of node trees* in normative sections. Thus, I think we can resolve almost all issues around the naming

1. composed tree (of component trees (or node trees)) => No longer used in normative sections
2. composed {parent/child/...} => Renamed to `shadow-including xxx`
3. component tree => Removed, in favor of node trees
4. fragment tree and primary component tree => Removed, in favor of node trees
5. flat tree => Keep it

I think we can close this issue now.



---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/382#issuecomment-200659674