Re: [webcomponents] Figure out terminology for Shadow DOM that everyone agrees on (#382)

> I suspect he agrees with me, but who knows.

ha. 


document tree or node tree don't hint anything in the name that they might deal with shadow dom too, so I'm rather strongly against using them in cases when there are nodes both in shadow DOM and in light DOM.
But node tree is fine for whatever subtree where there is a node as a root and one can use normal DOM accessors to get to the descendants. So inside shadow DOM it is fine.

And yes, shadow DOM shouldn't care about whether the host is in document or not.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/382#issuecomment-190741583