Re: [webidl] Add a [SecureContext] operator attribute (#65)

Is not exposing things even compatible at this point? If we cannot make `document.domain` have an effect because Facebook uses it too much, what makes us think we can change the exposure rules for a bunch of APIs limited to secure contexts? Or do we only do that for future APIs? If so, then it seems we can couple it with `document.domain` too.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/65#issuecomment-164739917

Received on Tuesday, 15 December 2015 11:46:12 UTC