W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2008

Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:00:44 -0700
Cc: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>, "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>, "public-appformats@w3.org" <public-appformats@w3.org>, Eric Lawrence <ericlaw@exchange.microsoft.com>, Zhenbin Xu <zhenbinx@windows.microsoft.com>, Gideon Cohn <gidco@windows.microsoft.com>, Sharath Udupa <Sharath.Udupa@microsoft.com>, Doug Stamper <dstamper@exchange.microsoft.com>, Marc Silbey <marcsil@windows.microsoft.com>
Message-Id: <25A3B655-F06F-45CC-BB24-3B0F05DBCF3D@apple.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>

On Apr 29, 2008, at 2:14 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> Given the multitude of issues raised, and the obvious back-and-forth
>> that denotes many differing opinions, I'd suggest having a telecom to
>> discuss these questions, and make sure that Sunava, Eric and myself  
>> can
>> attend.
> I'm with Anne on this. Please reply to the e-mails before convening a
> telecon. It is very difficult to carefully consider feedback in the
> context of a telecon.
> The problem isn't "back-and-forth" denoting "many differing  
> opinions", the
> problem is that we don't know what Microsoft's opinion _is_.
> Telecons are by their nature much less open, and minutes are almost
> uniformly so poor that it is hard to impossible to get precise  
> technical
> details out of telecons. A telecon would not be appropriate at this  
> point.

I would also prefer to see a clear statement of Microsoft's position  
in written form ahead of the telecon. By their nature, these are  
issues that need careful analysis, and cannot be evaluated fully in  
the context of a teleconference.

Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2008 00:01:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:26 UTC