W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Progress draft, cancel/bubble

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:27:08 +0100
To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t0w1binh64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:09:22 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile  
<chaals@opera.com> wrote:
> Raised ISSUE-118. Removing what it says there and deferring to D3E would
> be consistent with the bit that says D3E is the normative reference. But
> that would overturn the decision that the events must not foo (I am happy
> to overturn that decision if the group is), which is reflected in the  
> must statement after the table of events.
>
> I propose to change the spec and let is say what Cameron suggests (i.e.  
> to clarify the current difference between Progress and D3E in line with  
> how Progress says it should be clarified),and thus to close this issue.

You're confusing events the user agent raises with events the script  
author initiates. That is, the decision we made applies to user agents,  
not custom events.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 28 October 2007 16:27:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:58 GMT