On 5/8/07, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Tue, 08 May 2007 01:16:57 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> > wrote: > > On May 7, 2007, at 3:11 PM, Innovimax SARL wrote: > >> I agree that it seems strange to have an "XML"HttpRequest that does not > >> support XML at all !! > > > > I don't necessarily agree with that, I can see that non-XML UAs may > > still want to support it only for transmitting text. But I think there > > should be a conformance class that does include the XML support, even if > > the baseline conforming implementation doesn't. > > That makes sense. I added a "conforming XML user agent" class. I hope this > satisfies the people who replied in this thread (all in To:). Fine by me, Thank you very much ! > > > (I'm treating the comment from Stewart Brodie as a separate comment.) > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > <http://annevankesteren.nl/> > <http://www.opera.com/> > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2007 17:04:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT